Take that, Buck!
Alastair and I hunkered down last night in front of the TV with a bottle of wine, bread and cheese, a lovely caesar salad (anchovies aplenty!), and some pizza. The occasion — yesterday’s midterm election — was considerably less jovial than our usual get-togethers: Project Runway, Top Chef, Glee. And while it wasn’t good news for the Dems, it could have been a lot worse, especially here in Colorado. We don’t often get political at DOD — this may be the first time we’ve used the “politics” tag– but we can’t help ourselves right now.
As of this writing — 11:15 AM on Wednesday — the Denver Post has called the election for Michael Bennet; both CNN and the Times have him up by more than 10,000 votes over the odious Ken Buck, though have not made it official on their websites. Bennet is also giving a victory speech today at noon. Do we love Michael Bennet? Not so much. The appointed Senator had never run for office when he was selected by Bill Ritter in some old-boys-backroom deal to fill the seat vacated by Ken Salazar. Strange as it may seem, we do have various elected representatives in Colorado he could have selected, people with experience in electoral politics. But no. Combine this with the fact that Bennet is not exactly a charmer and we remain skeptical: about his record, about his abilities.
But Ken Buck. Come on Colorado! He was a garden variety Tea Party wing-nut until he made it personal for your DOD boys, comparing homosexuality to alcoholism. According to Buck, both might have some basis in biology, but that homosexuality is a choice. Really?!? (And does this apply to alcoholism as well? A choice?) Combine this with his anti-amnesty, anti-choice, anti-separation-of-church-and-state crazy conservatism, and we were downright embarrassed for lil’ ol’ Colorado. Until that embarrassment was trumped by anger that he was so popular. So we’re pleased that Colorado voters seem to have preferred Bennet to Buck — barely — and that they rejected all the crazy amendments and that they turned their backs on Tom Tancredo as well. We can hold our heads up reasonably high — at least not duck them down — when we leave the Centennial State, knowing that, like Nevada and Delaware, we didn’t send the Tea Party to the Senate. Our condolences to the gays and progressives of Florida and Kentucky.
We ♥ Mondo Guerra Even More!
His third consecutive win. The bold print and sleek little top. His adorable mother. His wry sense of humor. His humility. His coming out as HIV-positive on national television. His being our Denver neighbor. In short, what’s not to love?
Let’s also have a moment here for Valerie Mayen, whose designs may have bored us toward the end a wee bit, but who gave us one of the best parting moments we’ve had on Project Runway. As she talked about each designer, I kept expecting her to stumble and be less articulate in her description of the next one. But stumble she did not. Her comments were heartfelt, individualized, and moving. Dear reader, I am not ashamed to admit that between Mondo and Valerie and Tim, this DOD boy was sobbing like a small child. And that was not such a bad place to be.
See our Season Finale Wrap-up Here.
Blake’s Book Nook, Vol. III
Following the positive review of her new book in the Sunday Times book review, yesterday I picked up a copy of Rebecca Traister’s Big Girls Don’t Cry: The Election that Changed Everything for American Women. And I read the whole thing pretty much in one sitting last night. I did pause for dinner.
Traister’s book is an account of how gender politics played out in the 2008 election and what this meant for women then and means for them now and in future elections. Traister covered the election for Salon and saw many of the candidates in action. But more than what the candidates themselves said, this book is about how Americans — and the media especially — reacted to what they said, didn’t say, and what some believed they said even when they didn’t really. It’s about how the media dealt with the issue of gender: with the fact of a woman running for president, the first woman in the history of the United States to win a primary election; with a Republican vice-presidential nominee who claimed to be a feminist but was rejected by most others who claim that name; with the potential of the first African American first lady who happened to be as accomplished as her husband. It’s about sexism and sexist expectations for female politicians. And it’s a really good read.
Traister is open about her politics. She is a progressive feminist who votes for Democrats. At the beginning of the primary season she supported John Edwards, who, she rightly points out, had an agenda further to the left than either Clinton or Obama. As she also points out, he is a white guy, and could probably get away with being further to the left than the black guy or the white woman. That said, Edwards could not garner enough votes and dropped out of the race. Traister ends up voting for Clinton in the Super Tuesday primary. But she did so reluctantly, acknowledging that Obama and Clinton actually agreed on much but also that for almost all voters some form of identity politics was at play. One of Traister’s greatest arguments is about the way that those who might not have supported Clinton initially — in part because of her decision on the Iraq war, her being a Clinton, and her increasing centrism — came to do so precisely because of how horribly everyone was treating her. And on this count, Traister provides unassailable evidence. It makes you mad all over again.
And so the book is not an homage to Clinton, who, like all politicians, Traister sees as flawed in certain ways; instead it is an exploration of how Clinton was treated by the media as well as by all kinds of supposedly progressive white men whose vitriol for her struck Traister as pretty misogynist. Hear, hear! But Traister doesn’t stop there; she also looks at the reaction to Sarah Palin, a polarizing figure in all kinds of other ways. And to Michelle Obama, who was required — in the tradition of First Lady HRC — to tone down her own individuality and play up her wife- and motherhood in order to meet with much acceptance. Traister is also interested in the role of women in pop culture: feminist bloggers, feminist activists, newscasters, comediennes. The book includes excerpts from her interviews with Gloria Steinem, Shelby Knox, Katie Couric, Rachel Maddow, Samantha Bee, Amy Poehler, and many others.
I have one quibble with the book, or at least one that won’t be too much of a spoiler. Traister writes about the people who tended to support the different candidates she discusses (by age, sex, race, etc.) and, as I noted, pays particular attention to the ire that many supposedly liberal white dudes had for HRC (also noted by others at the time, including our blogging gal pal Historiann, to whom I will be lending this book). Traister characterizes them, in passing, as straight, but doesn’t delve into that so much. I would have liked to hear more about that, as it was always my impression at the time that many gay men were pretty enthusiastic about Hillary, even if they also had some of the misgivings that I have already mentioned (I’ll go on record, albeit pseudonymously, and put myself in this camp). So what might this have to do with being a straight guy? Why might some otherwise progressive straight dudes have found HRC so threatening, whereas their queer brethren did not? What might this have to do with the ways that straight men and gay men differently interact with (straight) women? I’ve got my theories but I would have loved to have heard Traister’s.
In sum, for those of us who are progressive and feminist, the book is pretty absorbing. For those of us who hope to see the day when a woman sits in the Oval Office, particularly a feminist woman, it’s a must-read. Traister believes that the 2008 elections actually got us closer to that goal. I sure hope she’s right.
We ♥ Mondo Guerra
Before I talk about the ways that Mondo Guerra has worked his way into our hearts, let me say a few other things about last night’s show:
- People are really funny talking about Ivy: She can sew, but she’s not so much as a designer. She’s intense and bitchy and exacting. She thinks pretty highly of herself.
- Gretchen — despite a few snide comments about Casanova — seems to have calmed down somewhat from her earlier antics. Perhaps she took Tim’s criticism to heart?
- Kristen Bell? Really?!? Has it come to this, Project Runway? Is she about to appear in some Lifetime TV movie and this was something worked out with the network? ’Cause she is hardly known for her fashion forward choices. Aside from Veronica Mars and that unfortunate looking film about some wedding in Italy with Josh Duhamel, she is hardly known at all. Did you see the dress she was wearing? Did you see the way that Kors and Heidi and la Garcia hardly interacted with her? Did you hear her say that she would wear April’s “dress” on the red carpet? Did you hear her describe herself as punk baby doll? Did you ask yourself why that would be a good idea for an aesthetic? As far as guest judges go, it was a train wreck from beginning to end.
But now on to MONDO! Yes, he may have designed a “junior” outfit (a term heretofore confined to department stores) that the judges hated. Yes, even we may have thought it was a bit silly looking, but for all these reasons, we love him still:
- His description of Ivy: “She’s a powerhouse and a bossy lady.”
- His wonderful turnaround on the Michael C front. Do I love Michael C? I do not. But Mondo seems to have realized that he may have judged him too harshly. And he said this, not only to us at home, but also to Michael himself, apologizing for being a bitch and a dick and a jerk. Props to Mondo.
- And then he did so again on the runway, claiming that whatever faults his outfit had, they were not because of Michael’s sewing.
- His outfits! I loved the little suit with the pink shirt and the bowtie. Adorable!
- His hair! So many options, so many styles!
- His tiny little limbs in those shorts and t-shirts. Alastair and I are on the smaller side ourselves and we do like to see the non-muscled gays represent.
- He’s from Denver!
Mondo Guerra, will you be our friend when you return to the Mile High City? This city needs more folks like you. Where do you hang out? Who are your friends? Do you belong to a little clique of fashionable hipsters? If so, can we join you? Please email us at downandoutindenver AT gmail DOT com.
9/17 Post-Mondo Win Update: Click Here and Click Here for 9/30 Update after his third win.
See our Season Finale Wrap-up Here.
Project Runway, Season 8
Needless to say, we here at DOD are super excited for the beginning of Season Eight of Project Runway. I was galavanting around the East Coast on premiere night so only caught it upon my return. It looks like we could have a whole lot of fun this time around. I’m not thoroughly convinced that they are all super-talented, but I’m certainly ready to be surprised. At this point there are so many of them and their clothes come down the runway so rapidly that it’s a little difficult to keep things straight in my head. A few thoughts:
Where is Models of the Runway?!? It is difficult to figure out what’s going on from MyLifetime.com, but the new 90-minute format of PR and the lack of MotR this first week suggest that it is a thing of the past. I have to admit, and though it took me a little while to get used to, I actually really liked MotR. I’m going to miss it. And there is no way that it can be replaced by On the Road with Austin and Santino. You could not pay me to watch that.
There are definitely some cute boys, chief among them Christopher Collins and A.J. Thouvenot. And girls; I like that Sarah Trost.
Jason Troisi would be cute if he never, ever, actually opened his mouth. Not just to speak but because his cuteish face is ruined by something that happens when he smiles. Or, of course, talks. Because he is apt to emphasize his love of breasts or his 100% pure Italian heritage or his penchant for hats that will intimidate others.
Peach Carr may be out of her league but I really hope she lasts. Yes, she tends to overemphasize her age, but she’s also pretty funny. And her name is Peach.
While I loved the convo en espanol con la Garcia, Casanova’s dress (!?!) was horrible. Selma Blair (I heart Selma Blair) was particularly funny about it, saying it could be sold in a store at the mall called Razzle Dazzle that specialized in dresses and wigs. His lack of a first name is foolish.
Mondo Guerra is from Denver!
Nicholas D’Aurizio is going to be a cryer, and it’s not going to be pretty. His model, however, is gorgeous.
There was some pretty ugly clothing sent down that runway, which makes me even more irritated with Heidi for threatening to send home more than one person and almost never actually following through on it. I was perfectly comfortable losing McKell, but I would not have had a problem seeing any of those in the bottom going: it was all pretty bad. And Nina’s face let you know what she thought about every single one of the disasters.
Gretchen Jones may be a bit of a serious Susie (as my Gentleman Friend put it) but her dress was pretty and well made, if a bit on the boring side. Does she have it in her to take it all? We shall see…





















7 comments